Our Information Sourcing Standards
Every recommendation in Vitalnutrientadvice comes from verified and reliable scientific foundations. We are committed to transparency and academic integrity in everything we share with you.
Sources We Use
Peer-Reviewed Research Articles
We use exclusively studies published in recognized scientific journals such as Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Nutrients, and International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. Each study has undergone a rigorous peer review process before publication.
Government and National Agencies
We rely on guidelines from the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia, the World Health Organization (WHO), and European food safety authorities. These sources provide up-to-date recommendations for daily nutrient intake and food safety.
Graduated Nutritionists and Experts
Our team consists of licensed dietitians and nutritionists with postgraduate education. They interpret research findings and adapt them for practical application in the daily lives of our visitors.
Accredited Academic Institutions
We follow research from universities and scientific institutions around the world. Materials from Oxford, Cambridge, Stanford, and other leading institutions form the foundation of our advanced recommendations and analysis of the current state of nutrition science.
Clinical Evidence and Trials
For recommendations regarding dietary interventions, we use randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. We avoid anecdotal evidence and theories without experimentally verified results. Priority is given to clinically significant, not just statistically significant findings.
Industry Professional Bodies
We work with national organizations of food and beverage industries, as well as nutrition councils. Connection to the USDA nutrient database and similar databases helps us keep information about food composition accurate and current.
Information Verification Process
-
1
Source Identification
At the beginning, our team identifies the most reliable scientific sources on the topic in question. We verify the academic rating of journals, authors' h-index, and the number of citations for papers. We never start from secondary or popular sources without checking the original studies.
-
2
Critical Review of Methodology
Every article is critically evaluated in terms of trial design, sample size, potential biases and conflicts of interest. We ask: were corporations that would have an interest in the results funding the study? Is the methodology sound? Do the results make theoretical sense?
-
3
Synthesis of Evidence
We do not rely on a single study. We seek consensus through multiple studies on the same topic. If conflicting results exist, we analyze the differences and inform you about the uncertainties. Transparency about limitations is essential: we tell you what we know, what is uncertain, and what still needs research.
-
4
Expert Review
Every published recommendation undergoes review by experts outside our organization - independent dietitians, nutritional scientists, or physicians. This layer of independent verification ensures that personal opinions or conflicts of interest do not influence our message.
-
5
Regular Updates
Science does not stand still. All of our articles and recommendations are regularly revised when new research becomes available. The dates of last update are visible on every page, so you know how current the information is.
Disclosure and Transparency Policy
Conflict of Interest Transparency
We publicly disclose any financial relationships with supplement manufacturers, food producers, or organizations with interests in nutrition. On every page with product recommendations, all relevant affiliate relationships are listed. If there is a financial tie, it is clearly stated.
Citations and Bibliography
Every fact, statistic, or recommendation in our content is accompanied by a link or citation to the source. You can always click on the source to see the original study or government guideline. We believe in complete transparency through citations.
Warnings and Limitations
We clearly mark contraindications (content intended for certain groups with health conditions). We inform when information does not replace the advice of a licensed physician. No universal advice is provided - individual needs vary and personalized expert assessment is required.
Publication and Update Dates
On every article you see the date it was published and the date of the last update. Older articles (older than two years without re-review) receive a visible note about the need for verification. There is no hidden or outdated information.
Feedback and Corrections
We expect errors - science is cyclical and correctable. We invite you to report inaccuracies or inadequate advice. Email for corrections: [email protected]. We address every legitimately reported correction within 48 hours.
Editorial Independence
Our editorial team operates independently from the marketing department. Recommendations are not dictated by the desire to sell a product, but by what the evidence shows. If scientific findings show that something we have an affiliate relationship with is not recommended, we clearly state that.
Frequently Asked Questions About Nutrition Sources
Our recommendations are based on guidelines from recognized bodies such as the Ministry of Health, the World Health Organization, and licensed nutritionists. We are not a hospital, but we follow the same scientific standards that health institutions use when providing advice. For medical diagnoses or treatments, consult your doctor.
Science evolves through questioning and revision. When one new study contradicts the consensus, we don't change the recommendation immediately. We analyze the methodology of the new study, wait to see if other researchers confirm the findings, and move in line with how evidence accumulates. If a change is justified, we update the recommendation and clearly explain what changed and why.
We recommend supplements only when a connection between evidence and benefits exists. If we recommend a product or brand, it is clearly stated on the page and all affiliate relationships are disclosed. We never recommend something just because we receive a commission - scientific evidence must come first.
Nutrition science is complex and sometimes subject to genuine disagreement. We provide detailed information about where experts agree and where opinions differ. We point to study size, duration of research, and reasoning. Individual variations (genetics, health status) mean that what works well for one person may not work for another - we recommend experimenting under expert supervision.
Small studies or studies funded by manufacturers are often the only ones available for certain topics. We acknowledge those limitations. When we rely on findings from small or sponsored studies, we indicate the degree of uncertainty. Larger and independently funded studies take priority in our evidence syntheses, but we don't ignore smaller works - we just weigh them appropriately.
Trust science, trust the requirement
Our obligation is simple: verifiability and comprehensibility. At the end of the day, your health is too important to guess.Contact us